Third quarter 2025 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Jul 1 01:49:50 UTC 2025
Ending: Sun Jul 27 16:42:05 UTC 2025
Messages: 55

• Questions about copyleft-next   Richard Fontana
• Questions about copyleft-next   Bradley M. Kuhn
• Questions about copyleft-next   secureblueadmin
• Questions about copyleft-next   Richard Fontana
• Questions about copyleft-next   secureblueadmin
• Questions about copyleft-next   Richard Fontana
• Questions about copyleft-next   secureblueadmin
• Registration process for git.copyleft.org?   Josh Triplett
• Copyleft-next should not do unilateral disarmament via the sunset clause   Josh Triplett
• Questions about copyleft-next   Richard Fontana
• Questions about copyleft-next   Josh Triplett
• vs CC BY-SA 4.0   Winston de Greef
• vs CC BY-SA 4.0   Aaron Wolf
• vs CC BY-SA 4.0   Bradley M. Kuhn
• vs CC BY-SA 4.0   Richard Fontana
• Copyleft-next should not do unilateral disarmament via the sunset clause   Vasileios Valatsos
• What is permissive-next for?   James Frost
• Copyleft-next should not do unilateral disarmament via the sunset clause   Bradley M. Kuhn
• Registration process for git.copyleft.org?   Bradley M. Kuhn
• Copyleft-next should not do unilateral disarmament via the sunset clause   Richard Fontana
• What is permissive-next for?   Richard Fontana
• Copyleft-next should not do unilateral disarmament via the sunset clause   Richard Fontana
• Copyleft-next should not do unilateral disarmament via the sunset clause   Vasileios Valatsos
• What do the defined acronyms stand for?   James Frost
• Registration process for git.copyleft.org?   Bradley M. Kuhn
• What do the defined acronyms stand for?   Richard Fontana
• What do the defined acronyms stand for?   James Frost
• What do the defined acronyms stand for?   Richard Fontana
• What do the defined acronyms stand for?   Richard Fontana
• drafting strategy & “specious argument vector” vs. programmer readability (was Re: What do the defined acronyms stand for?)   Bradley M. Kuhn
• Code of Conduct: we need one (… in parallel / in addition to HBR)   Bradley M. Kuhn
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Vasileios Valatsos
• Re: Code of Conduct: we need one (… in parallel / in addition to HBR)   Ben Cotton
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Ben Cotton
• Re: Code of Conduct: we need one (… in parallel / in addition to HBR)   Xavier Coadic
• Re: Code of Conduct: we need one (… in parallel / in addition to HBR)   Aaron Wolf
• My view of copyleft and thoughts about copyleft-next   zefr0x at tuta.io
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Aaron Wolf
• My view of copyleft and thoughts about copyleft-next   Aaron Wolf
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Vasileios Valatsos
• My view of copyleft and thoughts about copyleft-next   zefr0x at tuta.io
• My view of copyleft and thoughts about copyleft-next   Aaron Wolf
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Richard Fontana
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Vasileios Valatsos
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Kuno Woudt
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Aaron Wolf
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Richard Fontana
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Aaron Wolf
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Richard Fontana
• Should there be a clause for AI?   Vasileios Valatsos
• Code of Conduct: we need one (… in parallel / in addition to HBR)   Denver Gingerich
• Code of Conduct: we need one (… in parallel / in addition to HBR)   Bradley M. Kuhn
• Re: Code of Conduct: we need one (… in parallel / in addition to HBR)   Ben Cotton
• Re: Code of Conduct: we need one (… in parallel / in addition to HBR)   Richard Fontana
• Re: Code of Conduct: we need one (… in parallel / in addition to HBR)   Aaron Wolf

Last message date: Sun Jul 27 16:42:05 UTC 2025
Archived on: Sun Jul 27 16:42:10 UTC 2025

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...