Code of Conduct (based on Contributor Covenant 3.0) for copyleft-next goes into effect within a week; final comments *now* please

[Bradley M. Kühn]

Vasileios Valatsos wrote:
> It is extremely interesting that you say this when the mailing list
> so far has had a single rule (HRB), which neither you, nor bkuhn
> upheld.

Please to not make these sorts of false accusations without evidence.
(BTW, the worry such a thing might happen is precisely why I felt the
CoC needed HBR specifically excluded.)

> (From https://git.copyleft.org/copyleft-next/hbr/src/branch/main/HBR.md)
> Norm 3 specifically says:
>
> > Except in extraordinary cases, private telephone calls, private
> > teleconferences, private in-person meetings, and private email
> > communications shall not be used to discuss substantive development of
> > this project. Should such private communications nevertheless occur,
> > participants in such communications are expected to publish
> > summaries of
> > any relevant discussions in a manner or medium accessible to the
> > general net public.

You missed the operate phrase “substantive development of this project”.

> Was this upheld?

Yes, no “substantive development of this project” was held, and if it
was, it was HBR cured in later posts (we do need to incorporate HBR
cures).

> However, in this specific situation and as it stands, it makes no
> sense and it a waste of time

If copyleft-next has a waste of your time, there's no obligation to
participate. 🤷
--
     -- bkühn — On Fediverse (via Mastodon): https://fedi.copyleft.org/@bkuhn